If you want decent quality you'll have to go for AAC. HE AAC and HE AAC v2 are mainly made to still sound decent at very low bitrates, for example for streaming. At higher bitrates they have more distortion than regular AAC. A good rule for optimal quality: LC AAC (regular AAC) over 80, HE-AAC v1 over 48 and HE-AAC v2 below. You could try encoding in HE-AAC v2 at 48Kbps. If that quality is good enough for you there is no reason not to use it as it'll save you some serious amounts of disk space. The best way to rip your CD's on Windows is with Foobar, Nero's AAC encoder, VBR and some high settings (I use the highest).
You won't hear the difference. If you want decent quality you'll have to go for AAC. Toontown Online Download Game. HE AAC and HE AAC v2 are mainly made to still sound decent at very low bitrates, for example for streaming. At higher bitrates they have more distortion than regular AAC. A good rule for optimal quality: LC AAC (regular AAC) over 80, HE-AAC v1 over 48 and HE-AAC v2 below.
Download PIXELA AAC LC CODEC by Canon Inc. From Canon website at http://www.usa. Marian Mexicanu 2013. canon.com/cusa/support. Comparison Between AAC and AC3. AAC codec makes small digital audio files so that it can store a larger. AAC comes in different object types like AAC LC. Hello Everybody, I need an documentation for MPEG 2 AAC LC decoder. I am newbie to Audio Field, so please help me out to understand AAC LC decoder.
You could try encoding in HE-AAC v2 at 48Kbps. If that quality is good enough for you there is no reason not to use it as it'll save you some serious amounts of disk space. The best way to rip your CD's on Windows is with Foobar, Nero's AAC encoder, VBR and some high settings (I use the highest). You won't hear the difference. Thank you haha! AAC HE (High Efficiency) is the spec of the codec designed for voice frequency use, low bitrates, suitable precisely for the range that human voices tend to be most audible in.
It is not and never should be used for music for a variety of reasons - all you'd have to do is try and encode some typical music and you'll understand it as soon as you attempt to play it back, it's pretty horrid. AAC LC (Low Complexity) is what's designed primarily as the 'music' spec of the codec and far more suitable for that purpose. Microsoft World Wide Telescope Full Version there.
It is what's been used for iTunes music since day one even in spite of them now offering MP3 and ALAC as options as well, but the default AAC encoder settings for ripping your own audio CDs will use AAC LC and the given bitrate. Opus is gaining some traction but it will never ever reach the levels of usage saturation that MP3 has (anything can play this codec, it is the most widely supported audio codec there is, even more than WAV - seriously) and AAC isn't too far behind (but still not even close to MP3's level of support). Ogg Vorbis is still a fine codec that finds itself somewhat well supported at this point in time (just not on Apple i-Devices, of course). Also: when encoding audio the primary differences between the codecs are at lower bitrates, under 160 Kbps - once you start encoding at 192 Kbps or higher, it's pretty much well understood that all current modern psychoacoustic modeling compression techniques (that means lossy audio compression, basically) end up sounding virtually identical to the overwhelming majority of listeners. Tl;dr If you intend to encode to AAC, use at least 192 Kbps (no need to bother with LC or HE because AAC HE can't be used to encode at such bitrates, it has a 64 Kbps 'bitrate ceiling' - if you're encoding at over 64 Kbps it's going to be AAC LC by default) and you'll be just fine. If you want to save a bit of space and willing to sacrifice just a tad of audio quality, use 160 Kbps but, unless you really don't have a choice, don't encode at 128 Kbps using AAC.